Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 OCTOBER 2007

Kerr v. Danier Leather Inc., 2007 SCC 44

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

Danier made an initial public offering of its shares by way of a prospectus. The prospectus included Danier's actual financial figures for the first three quarters and projected results for the fourth quarter of the fiscal year.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Does The Business Judgment Rule Have Any Application To The Disclosure Requirements Of The Ontario Securities Act?

Danier made an initial public offering of its shares by way of a prospectus.  The prospectus included Danier’s actual financial figures for the first three quarters and projected results for the fourth quarter of the fiscal year.  Before the public offering closed, an internal company analysis indicated that Danier’s fourth quarter results were below its forecast.  Danier did not disclose these fourth quarter results before the offering closed.  A number of individuals brought a class proceeding for prospectus misrepresentation under s. 130(1) of the Ontario Securities Act (the “Act”).  The trial judge found Danier liable for statutory misrepresentation.  He concluded that the prospectus impliedly represented that the forecast was objectively reasonable on the date the prospectus was filed and on the date the public offering closed and that the actual

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from