Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 DECEMBER 2022

Joint Retainers May Be Deemed To Have Ended Upon The Start Of An Adversarial Relationship

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In the recent decision of Capital Sports v. Trinity, 2022 ONSC 6128, the Divisional Court has examined the limits of solicitor-client privilege with regards to an joint retainer in the context...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In the recent decision of Capital Sports v. Trinity, 2022 ONSC 6128, the Divisional Court has examined the limits of solicitor-client privilege with regards to an joint retainer in the context of a joint venture. The court found that an implied joint retainer may end once the joint venture partners become adverse to each other. The Court made this finding in the context of the joint venture continuing past the period of adversity.

Capital Sports Management Inc. recently appealed a decision1 and further addendum2 ordering production of certain solicitor-client documents relating to a failed joint venture between Capital Sports and Trinity Development Group Inc.

The Joint Venture

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from