Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 APRIL 2020

It's Settled — The Binding Nature Of Class Settlement Agreements

MLT Aikins LLP
MLT Aikins LLP
Contributor
MLT Aikins LLP

MLT Aikins LLP

FIRM OVERVIEW MLT Aikins is a full-service business law firm of more than 375 lawyers with a deep...

View firm profile
Explore more from MLT Aikins LLP

It is a common feature of class certification and settlement that many class members will be unaware of the existence of either.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

It is a common feature of class certification and settlement that many class members will be unaware of the existence of either. While adequate notice of certification and settlement is a mandatory requirement under class action legislation, the binding nature of each is not dependent on actual notice to each and every class member.

Two recent cases involving class settlement agreements illustrate this point and highlight the importance of carefully scrutinizing the terms of the release when class members who did not opt out later seek to bring individual claims.

3113736 Canada Ltd. v. Cozy Corner Bedding Inc., 2020 ONCA 235

The respondent, Valle Foam, pleaded guilty to charges under the Competition Act and entered into an agreement to settle a class action on terms that did not include any payment to the class. Immediately after it agreed to settle the class action, Valle Foam filed for CCAA insolvency protection.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from