Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 FEBRUARY 2023

It's Not Up In The Air: Class Action Runs Out Of Fuel

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

Spencer v. Transat A.T. Inc., 2022 BCSC 2256 is a recent example of the BC Supreme Court exercising its gatekeeper role to screen out proposed class actions that are bound to fail.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Spencer v. Transat A.T. Inc., 2022 BCSC 2256 is a recent example of the BC Supreme Court exercising its gatekeeper role to screen out proposed class actions that are bound to fail. The court dismissed the plaintiff's certification application because it failed to disclose a cause of action, and then dismissed the plaintiff's application to amend her pleadings because her claims were time-barred. For both decisions, the court relied upon the Montreal Convention,1 which the court found to be a complete code regarding the liability of international air carriers. This case illustrates the powerful role that an attack on the pleadings can play in defending a proposed class proceeding, and also highlights the role that international conventions can play in circumscribing domestic class proceedings.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from