Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 FEBRUARY 2024

Ismail v First York Holdings Inc

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

Ontario Court of Appeal confirms doctrine of separability cannot save an arbitration agreement contained in a contract that was void from the beginning and never legally binding.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Ontario Court of Appeal confirms doctrine of separability cannot save an arbitration agreement contained in a contract that was void from the beginning and never legally binding.

Facts

Mr. Ismail and Mr. Abied began doing business together through First York Global Holdings Inc. (FYGH). They entered into two share purchase agreements with arbitration clauses. Mr. Ismail appointed Mr. Abied as his attorney with authority to sign agreements on his behalf. Three agreements were signed and executed by Mr. Abied on behalf of both parties:

  1. A FYGH Purchase of Business Agreement (the FYGH Purchase Agreement).
  2. A Shareholders' Agreement regarding the purchase by Mr. Ismail of 20 per cent of the shares of FYGH.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from