Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 DECEMBER 2015

Forsythe v Westfall: Forum Of Necessity & Access To Justice

Arguments about access to justice are not enough to oust the general principles of jurisdiction, according to a recent Ontario case.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Introduction: Did Ontario have jurisdiction?

Arguments about access to justice are not enough to oust the general principles of jurisdiction, according to a recent Ontario case. In Forsythe v Westfall, 2015 ONCA 810, the Court of Appeal for Ontario confirmed that the forum of necessity doctrine—which is influenced by access to justice concerns—does exist, but can only be applied in the narrowest and most exceptional of circumstances. This case wasn't one of them.

The end result? The courts of Ontario did not have jurisdiction to entertain the plaintiff's tort claim.

Facts leading to the jurisdiction motion

The plaintiff, Forsythe, was an Ontario resident.

She had been injured in a motorcycle accident in British Columbia, allegedly caused by an unidentified driver. The motorcycle's driver / owner, Westfall, was an Alberta resident and insured through an Alberta policy.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from