Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 MARCH 2021

First Merits Decision For Secondary Market Misrepresentation Class Action

Until recently, Ontario courts had not considered on the merits a class action under the secondary market misrepresentation provisions of the Ontario Securities Act.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Until recently, Ontario courts had not considered on the merits a class action under the secondary market misrepresentation provisions of the Ontario Securities Act. There was therefore some uncertainty about how courts would apply the different evidentiary standards that plaintiffs must meet at the various stages of a securities class action (i.e., leave to proceed, certification and trial). In Wong v. Pretium Resources, 2021 ONSC 54, Justice Belobaba summarily dismissed the plaintiff's claim, finding that the defendants had not made any misrepresentation by omission and that, in any event, the defendants had a valid reasonable investigation defence. Justice Belobaba held that while the plaintiff was able to meet the test for leave to proceed, they did not prove on a balance of probabilities that there was a misrepresentation or reliance.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from