Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 OCTOBER 2025

Evidentiary Standards And Remedial Common Issues At Certification: Syngenta AG v. Van Wijngaarden, 2025 BCCA 334

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In Syngenta AG v. Van Wijngaarden, 2025 BCCA 334, the British Columbia Court of Appeal reaffirmed the importance of the ordinary rules of evidence at certification hearings.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Syngenta AG v. Van Wijngaarden, 2025 BCCA 334, the British Columbia Court of Appeal reaffirmed the importance of the ordinary rules of evidence at certification hearings. The Court of Appeal also issued guidance on the certification of remedial common issues: where certified common issues cannot lead to a liability finding, it is an error to certify common issues about damages, disgorgement and health care cost recovery.

The rules of evidence still apply at certification

At certification, the plaintiff tendered thousands of pages of online materials appended to solicitors' affidavits. These materials included court documents from the United States, scientific studies, news articles, web pages, and advertisements, among other things. The Court of Appeal criticized this approach:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from