Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 NOVEMBER 2024

Evidence Rules Apply: B.C. Supreme Court Denies Class Certification Of Claims With No Basis In Fact

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In Bosco v Mentor Worldwide LLC, 2024 BCSC 1931, the B.C. Supreme Court declined to certify certain common issues due to flaws in the plaintiffs' evidence.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Bosco v Mentor Worldwide LLC, 2024 BCSC 1931, the B.C. Supreme Court declined to certify certain common issues due to flaws in the plaintiffs' evidence. The court found the plaintiffs had failed to provide evidence that there was 'some basis in fact' for the actual harm or materialized loss caused by the defendants' alleged negligence.

Background

Bosco is a proposed class action on behalf of Canadians who received the defendants' silicone breast implants. The plaintiffs allege that the breast implants cause or contribute to adverse health effects.

Some contested common issues related to alleged inadequate disclosure of the presence of heavy metals and other volatile chemicals ("toxins") in the implants, and whether this failure to disclose was negligent and/or in breach of consumer protection and competition legislation. The plaintiffs claim that the alleged toxins can diffuse through the shell of the implants causing harmful health effects and claim to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from