Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 FEBRUARY 2009

Court Upholds Internal Investigation Privilege

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

The Supreme Court of British Columbia recently upheld a claim for common law litigation privilege asserted by Canadian National Railway Company (CN) over documents created in the course of carrying out an internal investigation of the collision of two trains.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

HMTQ v. Canadian National Railway Company 2008 BCSC 1677

The Supreme Court of British Columbia recently upheld a claim for common law litigation privilege asserted by Canadian National Railway Company (CN) over documents created in the course of carrying out an internal investigation of the collision of two trains.

The decision in HMTQ v. Canadian National Railway Company 2008 BCSC 1677 provides significant guidance on how to maintain litigation privilege over internally generated documents. It also appears to relax the evidentiary requirements for maintaining such privilege and for resisting disclosure of such documents seized during the execution of a search warrant.

The requirements to resist disclosure of documents based on litigation privilege are as follows:1

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from