Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 FEBRUARY 2019

Court Rules Excluded Wiretap Evidence Admissible In Civil Trial

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

A "very active crack cocaine trafficker" is acquitted of a crime because the wiretap evidence against him is excluded in his criminal trial. What happens when he brings a civil action

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A "very active crack cocaine trafficker" is acquitted of a crime because the wiretap evidence against him is excluded in his criminal trial. What happens when he brings a civil action against the police officers who arrested and charged him, claiming that his rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms were violated? Can the wiretap evidence be used against him? And can he claim damages under the Charter, despite the excluded evidence indicating involvement in the crimes for which he was arrested?In a recent decision, Obiorah v. The Ottawa Police Services Board, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice said no to both.

Background

The plaintiff was arrested and charged with a number of drug and weapon related offences. Wiretap communications intercepted by the police led to his arrest, but these were ultimately excluded at the plaintiff's criminal trial. The criminal court was critical of the information provided by the lead investigator as part of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Please add at the end of every article before the disclaimer (remember to change the article id):

About BLG

See more popular content from