Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 SEPTEMBER 2016

Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 5 – September 9, 2016)

Blaney McMurtry LLP
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Blaney McMurtry LLP

It was in the US Steel CCAA proceeding in which the Court of Appeal agreed with the CCAA judge below that he did not have the jurisdiction under the CCAA to grant the remedy of equitable subordination.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Hello,

There was only one substantive civil decision released this week. It was in the US Steel CCAA proceeding in which the Court of Appeal agreed with the CCAA judge below that he did not have the jurisdiction under the CCAA to grant the remedy of equitable subordination. However, the court did not go so far as the judge below appeared to do and say that equitable subordination does not exist in Canada. It left that issue to another day, and suggested that a judge under the BIA may have the jurisdiction to grant equitable subordination. This provides another example where the lack of complete concurrence between the CCAA and the BIA could result in "forum shopping" as between Canada's two insolvency statutes.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from