Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 NOVEMBER 2026

Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 5 – 9, 2026)

Blaney McMurtry LLP
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Blaney McMurtry LLP

The Ontario Court of Appeal released seven civil decisions addressing constitutional challenges to municipal by-laws affecting unhoused persons, limitation periods in professional negligence claims, contingency fee assessments in settlements for minors, force majeure clauses during COVID-19 closures, vexatious litigant designations, and the scope of settlement releases.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Good afternoon.

Following are our summaries of the civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario for the week of October 5, 2026.

Continue Reading

In Heegsma v. Hamilton (City), the Court allowed an appeal by 14 unhoused people from the dismissal of their Charter challenge to the City of Hamilton’s by-law prohibiting tents and overnight stays in public parks. The Court ordered a new hearing before a different judge. The application judge had rejected the appellants’ evidence of overnight evictions because most of them had mental health or addiction issues. The Court held that relying on such stereotypes, and assessing credibility on a group basis, was an error of law. The Court also held that the application judge’s ss. 7 and 15 analyses were conclusory and did not apply the governing tests. He also erred in applying Canada (Attorney General) v. Power, which concerns legislation, to a municipal by-law. The Court held that Charter damages claims involving a by-law or its

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from