Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 SEPTEMBER 2024

Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 5 – August 9, 2024)

Blaney McMurtry LLP
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Blaney McMurtry LLP

T.O. Estate v. D.O. was a family law decision that dealt with debts owing between the spouses and their corporations. At trial, the $341,000 debt owing by the wife's company to the husband was found to be statute-barred.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

T.O. Estate v. D.O. was a family law decision that dealt with debts owing between the spouses and their corporations. At trial, the $341,000 debt owing by the wife's company to the husband was found to be statute-barred. The wife was found to owe $40,346 to the husband. The Court allowed both their appeals. The large debt owing by the wife's company was found not to be statute-barred, as it was a demand loan and demand was made within two years of when the husband sued on that debt. However, the Court found that the wife's personal debt was owing to the husband's corporation, not the husband, so the wife's appeal in respect of this smaller debt was allowed.

Lilleyman v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC was an appeal from the dismissal of a certification motion. The class action alleged a conspiracy to fix the price of canned tuna, but the representative plaintiff could not meet the basic threshold of pleading a reasonable cause of action. The Court dismissed the appeal on

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be ought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from