Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JANUARY 2026

Come Fly With Me: Non-Resident Class Plaintiff Picks Litigation Travel Companion For BC Class Proceedings

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

The British Columbia Court of Appeal has confirmed in Prince George Airport Authority Inc. v. Roy...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The British Columbia Court of Appeal has confirmed in Prince George Airport Authority Inc. v. Roy1 that a non‑resident's commencement of a proposed class proceeding does not bar a subsequently added British Columbia resident from applying for certification under s. 2 of the Class Proceedings Act (the "CPA"). Dismissing the defendants' appeal, the Court held that the CPA's text, context, and purposes support a flexible approach: once a BC‑resident class member is added as a plaintiff, that person may "commence" and pursue certification under s. 2(1)–(2), regardless of whether they filed the original notice of civil claim. The Court further emphasized the CPA's broad procedural discretion under ss. 12 and 40 and its objectives—access to justice, judicial economy, and behavior modification— prevail over rigid, formalistic readings, that would stymie otherwise viable class claims.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2025

See more popular content from