Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 MARCH 2019

Class Actions And Joint Expert Evidence: Guidelines From The Quebec Court Of Appeal

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault LLP provides a broad range of legal services, delivering strategic and...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

Since the reform of the Code of Civil Procedure of Quebec, which came into force in January 2016, the courts can impose joint expert evidence in some circumstances.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Since the reform of the Code of Civil Procedure of Quebec, which came into force in January 2016, the courts can impose joint expert evidence in some circumstances. In a judgment rendered on February 28, 2019 in the matter of Webasto v. Transport TFI 61, the Court of Appeal specified the conditions required to appoint a joint expert, in the context of class action proceedings.

Background

Pursuant to article 158 C.C.P., at any stage of a legal claim, for case management purposes, the court may, on its own initiative or on request, take measures to simplify or expedite the proceedings, notably as regards expert evidence.

Accordingly, the court can assess the relevance or necessity of expert opinions in view of the issues raised by the dispute.2 Further to article 158(2) C.C.P., the court may also impose joint expert evidence in certain conditions, « if it is necessary to do so to uphold the principle of proportionality and if, in light of the steps already taken,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from