Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 OCTOBER 2019

Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v. VimpelCom Ltd.: A Consideration Of "Obiter" And Obiter Commentary On Appellate Review

The Ontario Court of Appeal recently dismissed an appeal brought by the plaintiff, Catalyst Capital Group Inc., which stemmed from a series of lawsuits arising from the plaintiff's attempted purchase of Wind Mobile Group ...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

By Stephen G. Ross and Ankita Abraham, Student-at-Law

The Ontario Court of Appeal recently dismissed an appeal brought by the plaintiff, Catalyst Capital Group Inc., which stemmed from a series of lawsuits arising from the plaintiff's attempted purchase of Wind Mobile Group from VimpelCom Ltd. in 2014.1

This is an interesting case as the Court considered a number of legal concepts such as issue estoppel, cause of action estoppel and abuse of process. The Court also commented on two other propositions – what is considered "obiter" and what is the scope of appellate review – which were somewhat surprising in nature.

What follows is a brief summary of the decision and commentary on the two legal principles of what is "obiter" and the scope of appellate review.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from