Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 DECEMBER 2019

CaseNotes For December, 2019

Moodys Private Client Law
Explore more from Moodys Private Client Law

Barrett claims that he paid $27,333 in legal fees in respect to the three legal actions.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Moodys Tax
Moodys Tax
Author LinkedIn connections

  • John A. Barrett v Her Majesty The Queen, 2019 TCC 34- by Cory Chan

    Facts

    1. Barrett was involved in three separate legal actions:
      • a matrimonial dispute;
      • a wrongful dismissal suit; and
      • an oppression remedy action instituted by his former spouse against Barrett and two other corporations in which Barrett was a shareholder.
    2. Barrett claims that he paid $27,333 in legal fees in respect to the three legal actions.
    3. Barrett admitted that he had neither the invoices or documents concerning the legal fees nor the actual amounts that were incurred by him concerning the wrongful dismissal litigation. Barrett estimated the fees he incurred based upon 2 statement of accounts with limited details and for amounts in excess of those charges incurred.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

BLG At The SCC – What’s Coming In The Supreme Court’s Fall 2026 Sitting Schedule

The Supreme Court of Canada held its second annual ceremony marking the opening of the judicial year at its temporary home in the West Memorial Building, with Chief Justice highlighting the Court's increased caseload and architectural features. What significant constitutional and legal challenges will the Court address in its fall 2026 session, including cases on firearm regulations, Crown immunity, and vicarious liability?
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Article

Ontario Court Bifurcates Class Action As Practical Approach To Onerous Discovery Demands

An Ontario court granted a motion to bifurcate liability and damages stages in a class action alleging $500 million in hidden fees, finding that extensive documentary production requests were disproportionate and not relevant to determining liability. The decision addresses proportionality concerns in class actions where defendants face onerous discovery demands spanning millions of transactions over a decade.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Article

The Coldcard Exploit: Why Victims May Have Two Routes To Recovery

A five-year-old firmware defect in Coldcard hardware wallets has enabled attackers to systematically drain an estimated $116 million in Bitcoin from over 5,200 victims since July 2026. This unprecedented exploit raises critical questions about manufacturer liability and creates two distinct legal pathways for recovery: blockchain tracing against the perpetrators and potential litigation against Canadian manufacturer Coinkite for product defects that undermined the fundamental security promise of devices mar
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
WeirFoulds LLP
WeirFoulds LLP
Article

Supreme Court Strikes Down Privative Clause: What Democracy Watch v Canada Means For Administrative Decision-makers

The Supreme Court of Canada has unanimously struck down a privative clause in the Conflict of Interest Act that attempted to bar judicial review of the Ethics Commissioner's decisions. The ruling establishes that the Constitution guarantees a minimum of legality review over all administrative decisions, with implications extending to labour relations, workers' compensation, and immigration legislation containing similar clauses.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Article

US Passes New Automatic Military Draft Legislation. Will It Drive More Young US Expats To Renounce?

Starting December 2026, the US will automatically register eligible young men for Selective Service using government data systems, eliminating the need for self-registration. For US citizens living abroad and their children, this administrative shift introduces significant implications regarding military draft obligations, particularly for dual citizens who may have never lived in the United States. Families are increasingly examining how this development intersects with broader considerations around citize
United StatesImmigration
Moodys Private Client Law
Moodys Private Client Law
Article

Do You Now Have Canadian Citizenship Via The New Bill C-3? Will More American-Canadians Have Dual Citizenship To Renounce Their US Passports?

Bill C-3 has opened doors for thousands of Americans to claim Canadian citizenship through ancestry, but this newfound status comes with an unexpected complication. Despite holding a Canadian passport and living permanently in Canada, US citizens remain subject to IRS tax obligations and reporting requirements that can create significant financial and administrative burdens for dual citizens.
CanadaTax
Moodys Private Client Law
Moodys Private Client Law
Article

US Expats Face Another Tax Setback In The Courts: Is It Time To Finally Renounce US Citizenship?

Recent US court rulings have confirmed that foreign tax credits cannot offset the Net Investment Income Tax for American citizens living abroad, creating an additional layer of taxation even when income is already taxed in their country of residence. These decisions raise critical questions about the long-term viability of maintaining US citizenship for entrepreneurs and business owners who have permanently established their lives outside the United States.
United StatesTax
Moodys Private Client Law
Moodys Private Client Law
Article

Are You Ready To Pay More To The IRS? New Wealth Tax Proposal Seeks To Penalize Ultra Rich Expats And Make Renunciation Costlier

Senator Elizabeth Warren has reintroduced the Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act, proposing a 2% annual tax on net worth exceeding $50 million and a controversial 40% exit tax on wealthy Americans who renounce their citizenship. For US citizens living abroad who face unique tax burdens despite receiving minimal benefits from US systems, this legislation raises critical questions about the financial implications of maintaining American citizenship while permanently residing overseas.
United StatesTax
Moodys Private Client Law
Moodys Private Client Law