Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 APRIL 2020

Case Commentary: Provost v. Dueck Downtown Chevrolet Buick GMC Limited, 2020 BCCA 86

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

A recent case issued by the British Columbia Court of Appeal provides guidance regarding the duty of care owed by business owners and confirmed the principles with respect to the determination...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A recent case issued by the British Columbia Court of Appeal provides guidance regarding the duty of care owed by business owners and confirmed the principles with respect to the determination of a novel duty of care.

A GM Sierra pickup truck was stolen from the premises owned and operated by Dueck Downtown Chevrolet Buick GMC Limited ("Dueck"). Prior to the theft, the truck was left unattended by an employee of Dueck, Kyle Katerenchuk, with the motor running and the keys in the ignition. The truck was then stolen by the respondent David Bolton.

After activating the OnStar online navigation system in the truck the police were able to locate the vehicle and attempted to arrest Mr. Bolton. Mr. Bolton evaded arrest and, over an hour after the theft of the vehicle, was involved in three motor vehicle collisions, which resulted in serious personal injury to two other motorists: Constable Quinn Provost and Brandy Brundige.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from