Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 NOVEMBER 2011

Canadian Supreme Court says hyperlinking to a defamation is not defamatory

The Court concludes that to hyperlink is not to publish and that to hyperlink to a defamation is not to defame.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The emergence of the Internet has raised new questions around the law of defamation – most recently, whether hyperlinking comes within the scope of the publication rule.

The Canadian Supreme Court, in a decision released this month, has given freedom of the Internet a fillip by concluding that to hyperlink is not to publish and therefore that simply to hyperlink to a defamation is not to defame.

This Brief Counsel looks at the judgment and its implications.

The legal test for defamation

A defamation claim involves legal action to protect a person's reputation from unwarranted injury by the words of another.  Defamation law 101 requires the aggrieved party to show:

  • publication of words

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from