Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JANUARY 2024

Can An Adverse Possession Claim Be Used To Acquire Public Parkland?

In an important ruling on the issue of "public benefit", the Ontario Court of Appeal in Kosicki v. Toronto (City), 2023 ONCA 450 ("Kosicki") has held that a private...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Overview

In an important ruling on the issue of “public benefit”, the Ontario Court of Appeal in Kosicki v. Toronto (City), 2023 ONCA 450 (“Kosicki”) has held that a private landowner cannot gain title to municipal parkland through adverse possession unless the municipality has expressly waived its right over the property or acknowledged or acquiesced to the possession.

Facts

The appellants in Kosicki  owned a residential property near the Humber River in Toronto (the “Property”). The City of Toronto (the “City”) was the registered owner of a strip of land to the south of the Property (the “City Lands”), and adjacent to a park. The City Lands included a trapezoid-like parcel, which had been fenced and used exclusively by the owners of the Property since at least 1971 as part of their backyard (the “Disputed Land”).1 The appellants maintained the Disputed Land and paid realty taxes on it until 2020.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from