Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 APRIL 2017

Businesses May Be Helped By Law Society Rule Change

Blaney McMurtry LLP
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Blaney McMurtry LLP

The Law Society of Upper Canada, which governs the practice of law in Ontario, has rewritten one of its rules of professional conduct to create greater clarity for lawyers on how assertively they may represent clients...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Author LinkedIn connections

The Law Society of Upper Canada, which governs the practice of law in Ontario, has rewritten one of its rules of professional conduct to create greater clarity for lawyers on how assertively they may represent clients in litigation intersecting with regulatory matters.

This could make for less ambiguity in litigation, more confident advocacy, and speedier, more cost effective resolution of disputes.

These implications flow from a Law Society decision taken last February to amend Rules 3.2-5 and 3.2-5.1 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, previously referred to as the "threatening criminal proceedings" rules.  

These amendments provide clarity to the profession regarding what types of threats and complaints to regulatory authorities are, and are not, acceptable when acting on behalf of a client.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

BLG At The SCC – What’s Coming In The Supreme Court’s Fall 2026 Sitting Schedule

The Supreme Court of Canada held its second annual ceremony marking the opening of the judicial year at its temporary home in the West Memorial Building, with Chief Justice highlighting the Court's increased caseload and architectural features. What significant constitutional and legal challenges will the Court address in its fall 2026 session, including cases on firearm regulations, Crown immunity, and vicarious liability?
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Article

Ontario Court Bifurcates Class Action As Practical Approach To Onerous Discovery Demands

An Ontario court granted a motion to bifurcate liability and damages stages in a class action alleging $500 million in hidden fees, finding that extensive documentary production requests were disproportionate and not relevant to determining liability. The decision addresses proportionality concerns in class actions where defendants face onerous discovery demands spanning millions of transactions over a decade.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Article

The Coldcard Exploit: Why Victims May Have Two Routes To Recovery

A five-year-old firmware defect in Coldcard hardware wallets has enabled attackers to systematically drain an estimated $116 million in Bitcoin from over 5,200 victims since July 2026. This unprecedented exploit raises critical questions about manufacturer liability and creates two distinct legal pathways for recovery: blockchain tracing against the perpetrators and potential litigation against Canadian manufacturer Coinkite for product defects that undermined the fundamental security promise of devices mar
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
WeirFoulds LLP
WeirFoulds LLP
Article

The Supreme Court Of Canada Reviews Québec’s Bill 21

Québec's Bill 21, enacted in 2019, bans public sector workers from wearing religious symbols and is shielded from most Charter challenges by the notwithstanding clause. The Supreme Court of Canada is now reviewing this controversial law, with a ruling expected as early as November 2026 or later in 2027. Former Minister of Justice Arif Virani discusses the court's struggle to balance competing constitutional principles in this landmark case.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Torys
Torys
Article

Supreme Court Strikes Down Privative Clause: What Democracy Watch v Canada Means For Administrative Decision-makers

The Supreme Court of Canada has unanimously struck down a privative clause in the Conflict of Interest Act that attempted to bar judicial review of the Ethics Commissioner's decisions. The ruling establishes that the Constitution guarantees a minimum of legality review over all administrative decisions, with implications extending to labour relations, workers' compensation, and immigration legislation containing similar clauses.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Article

Employment Update: Ontario Workforce Priority Stream - New Ontario Immigrant Nominee Program

Ontario has launched a major overhaul of its Provincial Nominee Program, consolidating eight immigration streams into four and introducing the new Ontario Workforce Priority Stream with updated eligibility requirements. The changes expand access to workers across all skill levels while implementing stricter employer compliance measures and a redesigned Expression of Interest scoring system that prioritizes labour market integration factors.
CanadaImmigration
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Article

Employment Update: The Court Of Appeal Provides Guidance On The Forfeiture Of Equity Incentives Upon Dismissal

When an Ontario employer terminates an employee holding unvested Restricted Stock Units, can forfeiture clauses in equity agreements lawfully eliminate the employee's right to continued vesting during the statutory notice period? The Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in Wigdor v. Facebook Canada Ltd. addresses this critical question, examining whether such provisions impermissibly contract out of Employment Standards Act protections and what financial consequences employers face when equity forfeiture term
CanadaEmployment and HR
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Article

Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 7 – 11, 2026)

This comprehensive summary examines six significant civil decisions from the Ontario Court of Appeal, addressing critical issues in cyber insurance coverage, wrongful dismissal, real estate commission disputes, and municipal election compliance. The cases establish important precedents on contract interpretation standards, successor employer liability, and the scope of public oversight in campaign finance audits.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Article

Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 2 – 28, 2026)

This comprehensive weekly summary examines critical Court of Appeal decisions addressing paralegal licensing authority in immigration matters, the proper use of vesting orders in family law enforcement, and the interpretation of indemnity agreements in commercial transactions. The cases explore fundamental questions about jurisdictional boundaries, procedural fairness, and the balance between creditor rights and family law remedies.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Blaney McMurtry LLP