Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 SEPTEMBER 2024

Avoiding The Appearance Of Bias – The Importance Of Arbitrator Disclosure

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

In a rare successful application under s.68 of the Arbitration Act, the Commercial Court recently set aside an arbitral award for apparent bias on the part of an arbitrator.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a rare successful application under s.68 of the Arbitration Act, the Commercial Court recently set aside an arbitral award for apparent bias on the part of an arbitrator. In this article, we look at the decision - in particular, the importance of disclosure by arbitrators.

s68 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (the Act) provides a mechanism for an arbitral party to challenge an award on the basis of serious irregularity. For an application to succeed there must be (i) a serious irregularity that (ii) causes substantial injustice. In the recent case of Aiteo E&P Company Ltd v Shell Western Supply and Trading Ltd & Ors, Jacobs J considered the merits of a s68 application brought by Aiteo E&P Company Ltd (Aiteo). Aiteo sought to set aside four arbitral awards by reason of apparent bias by one member of a three-person Tribunal.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from