Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 SEPTEMBER 2018

Auditors' Exposure To Liability Continues To Shrink

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

On Sept. 5, 2018, the Ontario Court of Appeal (the "Court") released its decision in Lavender v. Miller Bernstein LLP, clarifying the scope of an auditor's duties to non-clients.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On Sept. 5, 2018, the Ontario Court of Appeal (the "Court") released its decision in Lavender v. Miller Bernstein LLP, clarifying the scope of an auditor's duties to non-clients. Applying the principles set out by the Supreme Court in Deloitte & Touche v. Livent Inc (Receiver of), the Court overturned the decision of the Ontario Superior Court and found that the defendant auditor did not owe a duty of care to a class of individuals that was not the audience for the report reviewed by the auditors, and who did not personally rely upon the relevant misstatements. In making its decision, the Court or Appeal emphasized that establishing a duty of care in cases of pure economic loss is a significant threshold to pass.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from