Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 APRIL 2013

Arbitrator Considers Employer's Ability To Collectively Bargain Changes To Retiree Benefits

Hicks Morley Hamilton Stewart Storie LLP
Explore more from Hicks Morley Hamilton Stewart Storie LLP

In TRW Canada Ltd. and Thompson Products Employees' Assn., collectively bargained changes to vested retiree benefits were found to have been made without lawful authority.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Jordan Fremont
Jordan Fremont
Jennifer Del Vecchio
Jennifer Del Vecchio
Author LinkedIn connections

In TRW Canada Ltd. and Thompson Products Employees' Assn. (Retiree Benefits) (Re), collectively bargained changes to vested retiree benefits were found to have been made without lawful authority.

The changes had been proposed by the employees' association ("Association"), following a particularly hard round of collective bargaining, and after the employer threatened to close one of its plants if it did not obtain a "competitive labour agreement". The changes included the elimination of retiree semi-private coverage, the elimination of retiree life insurance, and the introduction of a retiree co-pay obligation. However, from the outset of collective bargaining, the Association asserted that it did not believe that the employer had the legal right or ability to reduce or eliminate the retiree benefits listed in the collective agreement. The Association later filed two grievances on behalf of an individual retiree and on behalf of all other retirees of the employer

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from