Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 APRIL 2025

Appellate Quarterly 04/10/25 – Key Takeaways

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

On April 10, 2025, McCarthy Tétrault's National Appellate Litigation Group hosted its second Appellate Quarterly webinar of the year, featuring five appeals of importance to the business community...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On April 10, 2025, McCarthy Tétrault's National Appellate Litigation Group hosted its second Appellate Quarterly webinar of the year, featuring five appeals of importance to the business community and the law around the country. Laura Gill, Jean-Philippe Mathieu, Kevan Hanowski, Michael (Ruofan) Cui, and Connor Bildfell discussed these recent appellate developments, as well as upcoming cases and future developments in their respective jurisdictions.

1. The role of negotiation evidence in interpreting contracts [Alberta]

In IFP Technologies (Canada) Inc. v. EnCana Midstream and Marketing ("IFP"), the Court of Appeal of Alberta concluded that evidence of negotiations is not itself admissible, unless such evidence demonstrates the factual matrix.1 The Court recently reaffirmed this principle in Chemtrade Electrochem Inc. v. Superior Plus Corporation.2 In that case, Superior Plus Corporation ("Superior") and Canexus Corporation ("Canexus") entered into an agreement

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from