Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 FEBRUARY 2019

Apotex Seeks Leave To Appeal Ramipril Pleadings Amendment Decision

As previously reported, the Ontario Court of Appeal (ONCA) granted Sanofi and Schering leave to amend their defences to plead the Supreme Court of Canada's decision ...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

As previously reported, the Ontario Court of Appeal (ONCA) granted Sanofi and Schering leave to amend their defences to plead the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in AstraZeneca Canada Inc. v Apotex Inc., 2017 SCC 36 ("AstraZeneca"). In the underlying action, Apotex relies on Sanofi-Aventis Canada v Apotex Inc., 2009 FC 676 ("invalidity decision") as a central element of its novel claims under the Ontario Statute of Monopolies, U.K. Statute of Monopolies and Trade-Marks Act. The invalidity decision found certain claims of Canadian Patent No. 1,341,206 invalid on the basis of the "promise doctrine", which was subsequently rejected as "unsound" in AstraZeneca. The ONCA concluded that depriving Sanofi and Schering of the opportunity to argue that the invalidity decision is suspect would be "fundamentally unfair". On January 7, 2019, Apotex applied for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada (docket No. 38471).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.

See more popular content from