Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 APRIL 2024

An Expanded Approach To Vicarious Liability Under The Highway Traffic Act

The Court of Appeal for Ontario recently expanded the applicability of the vicarious liability provision outlined in s. 192(2) of the Highway Traffic Act in Desrochers v. McGinnis, 2024 ONCA 63.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Court of Appeal for Ontario recently expanded the applicability of the vicarious liability provision outlined in s. 192(2) of the Highway Traffic Act in Desrochers v. McGinnis, 2024 ONCA 63.

The case involved an accident whereby the plaintiff, Megan, was operating an ATV on a dirt road when she lost control of the vehicle, striking a tree. Megan sustained a severe brain injury.

The ATV was owned by the defendant, Grant, who had entrusted the vehicle to his son, Patrick, who then gave Megan permission to drive the ATV.

At trial, the trial judge found Patrick negligent in permitting Megan to drive the ATV when he knew, or should have known, Megan did not have the necessary training or skill to do so. However, the trial judge dismissed the claims as against Grant for vicarious liability under s. 192(2) of the Highway Traffic Act having found that once Patrick had stopped driving the ATV, Grant was no longer statutorily liable for Patrick's negligence.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from