Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 FEBRUARY 2012

Alberta Court Releases Seminal Competition Law Costs Decision

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

In 321665 Alberta Ltd. v. ExxonMobil Canada Ltd., the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta released the first reported decision on a party's entitlement to costs pursuant to s. 36 of the Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c-34.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Copyright 2012, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Litigation & Dispute Resolution, February 2012

In 321665 Alberta Ltd. v. ExxonMobil Canada Ltd., the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta released the first reported decision on a party's entitlement to costs pursuant to s. 36 of the Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c-34. In the course of doing so, the court also had the opportunity to address a number of novel costs issues, including entitlement to compound interest, the effect of the plaintiff's delay on the calculation of pre-judgment interest and entitlement to costs for litigation financing.

Following a damages award, 321665 Alberta Ltd. (the plaintiff) sought a substantial amount of costs including:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from