Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 SEPTEMBER 2011

Aguas v Rivard Estate

The appellant commenced an action on October 6, 2003, against Curtis Rivard following a motor vehicle accident.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

2011 ONCA 494 (Released July 6, 2011)

Civil procedure – Dismissal order – Test to set aside

The appellant commenced an action on October 6, 2003, against Curtis Rivard following a motor vehicle accident. On August 15, 2007, the Registrar dismissed the action because the appellant had neither set the matter down for trial within two years of the filing of the statement of defence nor obtained an order from a judge presiding at a status hearing in accordance with Rule 48.14. The order dismissing the action was mistakenly sent to the appellant's former counsel, but not to current counsel. Counsel for the appellant did not discover that the action had been dismissed until September 2009. On October 7, 2009, the appellants filed a notice of motion to set aside the dismissal.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from