Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 NOVEMBER 2009

Foreign Suppliers Cannot Use Agreement On Internal Trade To Launch Procurement Complaint

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

On November 5, 2009, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a ruling that clearly restricts the ability of foreign companies to initiate procurement complaints under the Agreement on Internal Trade (AIT).

CanadaInternational Law

Copyright 2009, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on International Trade & Investment, November 2009

On November 5, 2009, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a ruling that clearly restricts the ability of foreign companies to initiate procurement complaints under the Agreement on Internal Trade (AIT). The decision in AGC v. Northrop Grumman et al. dismissed the appeal from a 2008 decision of the Federal Court of Appeal.

BACKGROUND

The initial complaint was made by Northrop Grumman Overseas Corporation (Northrop), a U.S. company incorporated in the state of Delaware, and it arose out of a procurement by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC). The procurement was for a supply of 36 advanced multi-role infrared sensor targeting pods and 13 years of in-service support for the pods. Northrop argued that PWGSC evaluated the bids in a manner contrary to the criteria contained in the published evaluation plan. One of the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from