Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 JUNE 2026

Developments In State Attribution, Governance, And Indigenous Self-determination In Mining Investment Disputes

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

International arbitration tribunals are increasingly holding States financially responsible for disruptions linked to Indigenous governance and protest in mining disputes.

CanadaInternational Law

Explore other chapters in the Mining Disputes Insights Series 2026.


Key takeaways

  • Mining investment disputes increasingly sit at the intersection of Indigenous rights, State regulation, and investor protection.
  • Tribunals are scrutinizing State conduct through the lens of Indigenous consultation, consent, and governance.
  • Recent awards suggest an expanded willingness to attribute Indigenous community conduct to States in certain circumstances.
  • These developments are reshaping legal and commercial risk for mining investors operating in Indigenous territories.

Why this matters

Social licence challenges and Indigenous governance issues are increasingly influencing project viability, regulatory stability, and exposure to international arbitration claims.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from