Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 APRIL 2026

2026 CUSMA Review: Enhancing Trade Negotiation Transparency

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Trade negotiations are in the air, everywhere you look around. They are launched, paused, restarted and concluded. Agreements are reached, then rescinded, ignored or revivified.

CanadaInternational Law

Trade negotiations are in the air, everywhere you look around. They are launched, paused, restarted and concluded. Agreements are reached, then rescinded, ignored or revivified. This past year, the public airwaves have featured more mention of tariffs and negotiations and trade deals than the last thirty years combined. Not since 1988, the year when an entire election was fought over free trade with the United States, has "trade" been a headline concern, and in any event, never for so long.

Yes, an election was fought over trade relations with the United States four decades ago. Trade and economic management are at the heart of democratic governance; democratic accountability requires transparency. And yet, trade negotiations, diplomatic and commercial exercises rolled into one, are steeped in discretion.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from