Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JANUARY 2018

Scandalous, Obscene, Or Immoral Trademarks Revisited

In September we discussed the potential registration of trademarks categorized as "scandalous, obscene or immoral" marks.

CanadaIntellectual Property

In September we discussed the potential registration of trademarks categorized as "scandalous, obscene or immoral" marks. A case raising this issue was at the oral argument stage before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The Court's decision has now been released.

The Facts

A Los Angeles designer filed several trademark applications for the trademark FUCT for use in association with a line of clothing. The applications were rejected by the U.S. Patent and Trademark office on the basis of non-compliance with the Lanham Act, which precludes the registration of a trademark that "consists of or comprises immoral, deceptive or scandalous matter".

The designer appealed the rejection to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The appeal was held in abeyance pending the release of the decision of the US Supreme Court in the SLANTS case. In that decision the Court found that a related provision of the Lanham Act, precluding the registration

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from