Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 MAY 2013

Pfizer Liable To Apotex For Section 8 Damages: Amount To Be Determined

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In a recent judgment, the Federal Court of Canada, granted Apotex's claim against Pfizer for section 8 damages under Canada's Patented Medicines Regulations, SOR/93-133.

CanadaIntellectual Property

In a judgment pronounced on May 10, 2013, Justice O'Reilly of the Federal Court of Canada, granted Apotex's claim against Pfizer for section 8 damages under Canada's Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations, SOR/93-133.  The sole issue before the Court was whether Apotex had a valid claim to damages.  The amount is to be determined in a subsequent proceeding.  For the full written decision see: Apotex v. Pfizer Canada Inc., 2013 FC 493.

The section 8 claim arises out of a failed prohibition proceeding.  In early 2000, Apotex sought approval for its generic version of ZITHROMAX (azithromycin), a significant anti-infective drug product marketed by Pfizer.  In response, Pfizer brought an application to prohibit Apotex from entering the market. Apotex alleged that its generic version of the drug would not infringe on Pfizer's patent.  Justice Snider agreed with Apotex and held that there was no infringement and dismissed Pfizer's prohibition proceeding: see P

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from