Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 FEBRUARY 2024

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Lighting The Way: What Businesses Need To Know About Comparative Advertising

One of the most important cases to come out of 2023 in Canada examined a rarely litigated provision of Canada's Trademarks Act (the "Act"): section 22. In Energizer Brands...

CanadaIntellectual Property

One of the most important cases to come out of 2023 in Canada examined a rarely litigated provision of Canada's Trademarks Act (the "Act"): section 22. In Energizer Brands, LLC v. Gillette Company, 2023 FC 804 ("Energizer Brands"), Canada's Federal Court (the "Court") clarified the scope and limits of comparative advertising for businesses wishing to make use of a competitor's registered trademark in the advertisement of its products. An issue the Court was tasked with resolving was whether the Defendant's use of the Plaintiff's registered trademarks in its advertising had the effect of depreciating the value of the goodwill attaching to those trademarks in contravention of section 22(1) of the Act.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from