Banks, fintech companies and payment processors who engage in R&D and file patents regarding computer-implemented inventions will want to take note of the Federal Court's Dusome v. Canada (Attorney General) (Dusome)1 decision, and the Canadian Intellectual Property Office's (CIPO) subsequently-issued guidance (the Guidance).
Although Dusome involved a poker card wagering game, its reasoning applies broadly to computer-implemented inventions, including financial-related computer technology.
In this Part 1, we briefly examine how CIPO is now approaching computer-implemented inventions post-Dusome, and how this applies to financial-tech innovation.
In Part 2, we draw on our survey of Canadian Patent Appeal Board (PAB) decisions to highlight patterns in what is likely patentable for financial technologies.