Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 DECEMBER 2014

Federal Court Rejects Inventorship Claim: Design Input Does Not A Co-Inventor Make

The Federal Court rejected a claim by Drexan Energy Systems Inc. to have two additional individuals named as co-inventors of the heating cable described in Canadian Patent 2,724,561.

CanadaIntellectual Property

On September 16, 2014, in Drexan Energy Systems Inc. v. Canada (Commissioner of Patents), the Federal Court rejected a claim by Drexan Energy Systems Inc. ("the Applicant") to have two additional individuals named as co-inventors of the heating cable described in Canadian Patent 2,724,561 (the '561 Patent). The decision confirms the test for inventorship, and provides guidance on the distinction between mere helpful involvement in the development of a product, and a contribution to an inventive concept that would be sufficient to allow the contributor to be named a co-inventor.

Heating cables are incorporated into pipes used in cold environments to prevent the transported substances from freezing. In 2006, four individuals decided to work together to create a new type of heating cable that eliminated some of the defects in cables available at the time. By 2010, however, the relationship between the men had broken down, and only two individuals were listed

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from