Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 OCTOBER 2013

Comparing US And Canadian Approaches To Determining Subject Matter Eligibility Of Computer-Implemented Inventions

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

The recent U.S. Federal Circuit decision of Accenture Global Services, GMBH v. Guidewire Software, Inc. ("Accenture") is a reminder that American law on patentable subject matter remains unclear.

CanadaIntellectual Property

Introduction

The recent U.S. Federal Circuit decision of Accenture Global Services, GMBH v. Guidewire Software, Inc.1 ("Accenture") is a reminder that American law on patentable subject matter remains unclear. While Canadian law and Canadian Patent Office practice concerning patentable subject matter have been in flux, several decisions rendered by Canada's Patent Appeal Board ("PAB") applying the Canadian Patent Office's new guidelines on examining computer-implemented inventions, particularly those directed at software and business methods, have brought some clarity to patent applicants as to the circumstances under which their inventions will be found to constitute patentable subject matter.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from