Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 MARCH 2013

Analysis Of Proposed Combating Counterfeit Products Act (Bill C-56)

Canada has been criticized internationally for many years for not having an effective regime for enforcing against counterfeit goods.

CanadaIntellectual Property

Canada has been criticized internationally for many years for not having an effective regime for enforcing against counterfeit goods. Need for reform was expressly recognized by two Canadian parliamentary committees in 2007. The CCPA finally addresses the issue by proposing trade-mark prohibitions and offences, and new customs measures for detaining counterfeits.

In our opinion, debate on the proposed Combating Counterfeit Products Act ("CCPA") should not concentrate on whether it is compliant with the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement ("ACTA") or other international treaties, but instead whether it provides effective measures for addressing the problem of black market distribution of goods bearing counterfeit trade-marks and pirated copyright works (collectively "counterfeits") in Canada. There is little doubt requirements under ACTA were a consideration in drafting the CCPA and the border provisions appear to be modeled on the World Customs Organization's "Model

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from