Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 OCTOBER 2022

Two Insurers, A Mutual Policyholder, And The Duty To Defend

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

In AIG Insurance Company of Canada ("AIG") v Lloyd's Underwriters ("Lloyd's") (2022 ONCA 699), the Ontario Court of Appeal was tasked with answering "whether two insurers have a duty to defend...

CanadaInsurance

Ontario Court of Appeal upholds Application Judge's treatment of Property Report Evidence

In AIG Insurance Company of Canada ("AIG") v Lloyd's Underwriters ("Lloyd's") (2022 ONCA 699), the Ontario Court of Appeal was tasked with answering "whether two insurers have a duty to defend a mutual policy holder in a progressive property damage claim."1 The Court ultimately dismissed Lloyd's appeal and left in place a previous order requiring Lloyd's and AIG to equally share the costs to defend the policyholder (City of Timmins).

Background Facts

Karine and Marcel Forget the ("Homeowners") purchased a vacant lot in 2012 upon which they intended to build a home. The lot was situated near the Mattagami river flowing through the City of Timmins (the "City"). The Homeowners obtained a building permit from the City in 2013, and built a new home on the property that same year.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from