Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 NOVEMBER 2016

Policyholders Stay Tuned: Final Word On The LEG 2/96 Defective Workmanship Exclusion Yet To Come

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

The BC Court of Appeal in Acciona Infrastructure Canada Inc. v. Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company grappled with the proper interpretation of the LEG 2/96 defective workmanship exclusion...

CanadaInsurance

As we reported here, the BC Court of Appeal in Acciona Infrastructure Canada Inc. v. Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company grappled with the proper interpretation of the LEG 2/96 defective workmanship exclusion common in many builder's risk insurance policies. Applying general principles of contract interpretation the Court held that the exclusion is restricted to denying only those costs that would have been incurred to prevent the damage from happening. Having been unsuccessful on the appeal, the Insurers filed an application for leave to the Supreme Court of Canada.

On October 20, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada rendered its decision on the Acciona leave application and remanded the case to the B.C. Court of Appeal for disposition in accordance with Ledcor Construction Ltd. v. Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co. This result is not surprising given that the Supreme Court in Ledcor held that the standard of review for appeals involving the interpretation

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from