Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 DECEMBER 2013

Non-Compliance With Rule 53.03 Limits The Testimony Of Treating Physicians

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

In the recently released decision of Spirito v Trillium Health Centre, 2013 ONSC 5238, the Ontario Superior Court limited the testimony of treating physicians who had not complied with Rule 53.03 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.

CanadaInsurance

In the recently released decision of Spirito v Trillium Health Centre, 2013 ONSC 5238, the Ontario Superior Court limited the testimony of treating physicians who had not complied with Rule 53.03 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.

This issue arose in the context of medical malpractice litigation following the death of a patient, Emilio Spirito, at Trillium Health Center. Mr. Spirito's estate and his family sued the treating physicians, hospital and nurses in negligence. The claim was dismissed in its entirety.

At the commencement of trial, the plaintiffs sought leave, under section 52 of the Evidence Act to file medical reports of two treating physicians and to call them as expert witnesses. The plaintiffs had not complied with the notice requirement for filing medical reports under the Evidence Act. Nor had they complied with the requirements of Rule 53.03.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from