Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JANUARY 2019

Competing "Other Insurance Clauses": Can One Trump The Other?

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

The Panel ultimately concluded that the two insurers must share the burden of defence and indemnity of the driver equally.

CanadaInsurance

In TD General Insurance Company v. Intact Insurance Company, 2019 ONCA 5, the Court of Appeal considered whether one insurer's "other insurance clause" could trump the other's. Both policies provided coverage for the loss and contained identically worded clauses making their policies excess to any other insurance which applied to the loss. The Court found that the identical clauses made the two policies irreconcilable and so the two insurers must share the burden equally under a coordinate obligation to make good the loss.

The Loss, Policies and Lower Court's Decision

The loss in this case arose out of a boating accident. The injured passenger sued the driver of the boat who was covered by two policies of insurance — the boat owner's TD policy and the driver's own homeowner's policy, issued by Intact. Both policies contained an "other insurance clause" that provided:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Please add at the end of every article before the disclaimer (remember to change the article id):

About BLG

See more popular content from