Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JANUARY 2016

Clarity On Quantum Of The Statutory Deductible And Pre-Judgment Interest?

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

In this case, the Justice James was asked to address threshold, pre-judgment interest and the quantum of the statutory deductible.

CanadaInsurance

Vickers v. Palacious, 2015 ONSC 7647, December 8, 2015, James, J.

In this case, the Justice James was asked to address threshold, pre-judgment interest and the quantum of the statutory deductible. The plaintiff was a cyclist that was struck in the back by a mirror from a vehicle that passed her long before the amendments to the deductible and interest rates were enacted.

The quantum of the statutory deductible, the defence argued, was that the indexed quantum introduced on August 1, 2015 ($36,540) was appropriate. The plaintiff argued otherwise stating that it is a matter of substantive rather than procedural law and therefore it could not be applied to accidents that occurred prior to its introduction.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from