Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 SEPTEMBER 2026

The Collection Process, Part 4: Examinations And Subpoenas To Debtor

When a judgment creditor needs to collect on a debt but lacks crucial information about the debtor's assets, British Columbia law provides two powerful investigative tools: examinations in aid of execution and subpoenas to debtor. These court-supervised processes compel judgment debtors to disclose their financial information under oath, revealing bank accounts, properties, and other assets that can be targeted for collection.

CanadaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Garnishing wages only works if you know where the money is. In Part 4 of our Collection Process series, we break down how an examination in aid of execution and a subpoena to debtor can force a judgment debtor to reveal their assets — under oath.

In our last three blog posts we talked about the most common methods of collecting from a judgment debtor. 

In each of those posts, however, there is some level of uncertainty with the collection methods: Garnishing is only effective if you know the bank account of the judgment debtor, for instance. 

So, how do you learn that information? 

There are two processes available: An examination in aid of execution, and a subpoena to debtor. 

An examination in aid of execution is, essentially, an interview of the judgment debtor. The judgment creditor (usually through their lawyer) asks the judgment debtor questions about their assets, ability to pay the judgment, other debts, and similar questions. The judgment debtor is under oath or

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from