Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 DECEMBER 2013

Preferential Payments: Commercial Imperative Or Creditor Pressure?

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

In the recent decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Orion Industries Ltd. (Trustee of) v Neil's General Contracting Ltd.1 ("Orion Industries") the Court interpreted and applied the rule added as part of the 2009 amendments to section 95(2) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act ("BIA") which deals with preferential payments.

CanadaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

In the recent decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Orion Industries Ltd. (Trustee of) v Neil's General Contracting Ltd.1 ("Orion Industries") the Court interpreted and applied the rule added as part of the 2009 amendments to section 95(2) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act ("BIA") which deals with preferential payments. That amendment provides that evidence of pressure by a creditor is inadmissible to support a preferential payment. The decision in Orion Industries suggests that a preferential payment made by a debtor that appears to have been made under pressure from the recipient creditor may withstand challenge by a trustee in bankruptcy if the payment is supported by evidence it was made in furtherance of a reasonable business imperative.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from