Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 MAY 2013

Pension Deficiency Priorities

A discussion on the Supreme Court of Canada decision on the priority given to pension fund deficiencies, in the context of an insolvency.

CanadaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Sarah Shiels
Sarah Shiels

On February 1, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision on what has come to be known simply as the Indalex case. The Supreme Court gave a final determination on the priority given to pension fund deficiencies, in the context of an insolvency.

Case Comment: Sun Indalex Finance, LLC v. United Steelworkers, 2013 SCC 6

The Supreme Court of Canada's recent Indalex decision sheds light on the ranking of creditors' and pensioners' interests in the context of CCAA proceedings, and provides some cautions to various classes of creditors of financially troubled companies.

By the spring of 2009, rising commodity prices and the economic recession had taken such a toll on the U.S. and Canadian branches of Indalex (aluminum extrusions manufacturers) that these companies were on the brink of bankruptcy. In light of their financial circumstances the companies took steps in the United States and Canada to restructure and protect their remaining assets. The Canadian

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from