Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 FEBRUARY 2006

Corportate Digest @ Gowlings - January, 2006

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

This article discusses the highlights of the information letter released by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency which clarified the impact of the amended Regulations to the Food and Drugs Act (Canada) on nutrition labelling in the restaurant and food service sector.

CanadaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Edited by Mr Rod Seyffert

Communications to Plan Members

On November 1, 2005 the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision in Hembruff v. Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement Board. The key issue for the Court to decide was whether the administrator of a pension plan has a duty to advise plan members that it is contemplating making benefit improvements to the plan. In summary, the Court held that a pension plan does not have a duty to advise plan members that it is contemplating benefit improvements during the period while such changes are under consideration. This is a welcomed decision by plan administrators, who until this decision faced considerable uncertainty as to their disclosure obligations to members.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from