Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 JUNE 2024

White And Montour Decision: Treaty Rights To Conflict Resolution

This is the last in a four-part series of commentary on the Superior Court of Quebec's recent decision in R. c. Montour, 2023 QCCS 4154 ("Montour").

CanadaGovernment, Public Sector

This is the last in a four-part series of commentary on the Superior Court of Quebec's recent decision in R. c. Montour, 2023 QCCS 4154 ("Montour"). This part focuses on the Court's finding of a treaty right to a "conflict-resolution procedure" protected by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982; how it can be extended to other historic treaties made in similar contexts; and how this renewed reading of treaties breathes life into Indigenous peoples' right to self-determination in Canadian law.

A treaty right to conflict-resolution mechanisms

The Court found that a series of ten historic agreements made between the British Crown and the Haudenosaunee Confederacy, including the Mohawk, from 1664 to 1760, together with and as part of a Covenant Chain, guaranteed the Mohawks' Aboriginal and treaty rights to free trade of tobacco and to discuss any issues related to the tobacco trade with the Crown. The Crown infringed these rights by imposing a rigid licensing scheme

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from